Navigation bar
  Print document Start Previous page
 89 of 352 
Next page End Contents  

  
To help understand how words can create obligations (doing things with 
words), Austin offers the concept of a ‘performative utterance.’
As Austin 
suggests, a performative utterance, or more simply a ‘performative,’
“indi-
cates that the issuing of the utterance is the performing of an action -
it is not 
normally thought of as just saying something.”
15
Performatives ‘do things’ 
rather than merely state the facts, and can be expressed in the first person 
singular present indicative active, such as ‘I give’
(in the context of a will), ‘I 
name,’
‘I bet,’
and more important to this discussion, ‘I promise,’
and ‘I agree 
to.’
16
Performatives can be accomplished using other sentence structures or 
even non-linguistic actions (gestures, signs, etc.), but will almost always 
reduce to the explicit form above (first person singular present indicative 
active). For example, by signing one’s name on a contract or shaking hands 
on a deal, a party may not necessarily explicitly say ‘I promise,’
but implicitly 
he/she does so nonetheless. 
In the execution of a performative, a person attempts to create a new 
element of social reality, such as an obligation or an expectation
that 
previously did not exist. Naturally, this process is the essence of contract. 
However, whether the performative act is successful and recognized by others 
depends on whether the circumstances and context are appropriate. Austin 
proffers three necessary conditions for a performative to be effective. 
a) A conventional procedure must exist for achieving the effect desired, and the
circumstances must be appropriate for using the procedure. 
b) The parties must execute the procedure fully and correctly. 
c) If the procedure requires certain attitudes or mindsets (e.g. sincerity), the 
participants must have them, and act in accordance with them in the 
future.
17 
Violating the conditions results in ‘infelicities,’
situations in which the 
performative either fails to achieve its purpose or is defective in some manner. 
Infelicities apply to all performatives, verbal and non-verbal; it “is an ill to 
which all acts are heir which have the general character of ritual or ceremo-
nial…”
18
For example, in the case of contracts, the law sets a conventional 
procedure for contract creation, which requires inter alia, offer and accep-