Navigation bar
  Print document Start Previous page
 71 of 352 
Next page End Contents  

  
deal of concern about Web site content, with indications that users may be quite 
motivated by content in their choice of specific sites to visit, as opposed to the 
recreational act of browsing  (Drèze & Zufryden, 1997; McDonald, 1997; Stafford 
& Stafford, 1998).  In short, it may be that what a site offers content-wise may be 
the attraction, which serves to bring consumers to the site, so that commercial 
transactions might take place. 
Potential Factors Motivating Web Users 
According to Stafford and Stafford (1998), Web site use might be character-
ized initially by process gratifications in recognition of the "Web surfing" phenom-
enon which has the potential to expose new users to site content.  However, while 
initial and accidental exposure could often be due to some random browsing effect, 
content gratifications seem more likely to represent the reason for continued site 
access, a perspective in line with McGuire's (1974) "holding power" arguments. 
Aimless surfing is an apt Internet characterization of McGuire's  process 
gratification, but bookmarking a site might be more representative of motivations 
arising from content gratifications.  When a user finds a site compelling enough to 
mark the return passage for a later visit, this is probably indicative of strong content 
interest.  Researchers have expressed concern about the ability to hold the attention 
of Web site users (Barker & Groenne, 1997), and it appears that site designers 
should be working on ways to increase a user’s involvement with Web sites--
motivating users to use sites actively and mark them for additional later use, rather 
than working out ways to enhance the users’ browsing experience. 
Researchers have already compared the Web to television in terms of 
potential effects and uses (Eighmey, 1997b; McDonald, 1997), an ironic analogy, 
since what is known about uses and gratifications theory comes from studies of 
television in its infancy (Stafford & Stafford, 1996).  In some cases, the television 
metaphor is directly applicable, as in the case of Eighmey (1997a; 1997b), who 
investigated corporate Web sites to determine user motivations with scales 
developed in earlier U&G studies of television. Certainly, television research has