Navigation bar
  Print document Start Previous page
 55 of 352 
Next page End Contents  

  
security practices for companies and individuals (Hurley, 1999). 
Privacy 
Computer technologies like the Internet facilitate the exchange of personal 
information that can be collected, aggregated and sold across the world. As 
companies can easily take advantage of personal information that becomes 
accessible on information networks, e.g., through direct marketing (Wang, et al.,
1998), several issues are at stake. The most important concern is whether 
information is collected, aggregated or sold with the individual’s explicit consent. 
There are several private organizations  (Better Business Bureau onLine 
(BBBOnLine), Worldwide Web Consortium (W3C), TRUSTe) that try to address 
the issue by giving a privacy ‘seal’
to Web sites that are fulfilling some set criteria 
of privacy protection. These include the responsibility to make visitors to web sites 
aware of what data is collected and giving them choice about making this data 
available to third parties. The TRUSTe white paper (http://www.truste.org/about/ 
about_wp.html) also emphasizes that Web sites bearing their Privacy Seal “must 
provide reasonable security to protect the data that is collected”. Security is seen 
as the technological aspect of the broader social issues that are related to privacy. 
Privacy is particularly important for the protection of sensitive personal data 
such as medical records, credit records, government data and personal data about 
children. The US government has taken an untied regulatory approach to protect 
such information. In other words the aim is to enable Internet users to choose for 
themselves what level of privacy protection they want (Nelson, 1999). In Europe, 
in contrast, data protection is stricter and has been articulated at a pan-European 
level (Allaert & Barber, 1998). In the United States, the EU directive (EC, 1995) 
has been perceived as being overprotecting for European companies, raising 
barriers to the free exchange of electronic data between Europe and other countries 
(Swire and Litan, 1998). Indeed, the European directive on data protection 
challenged electronic transactions and data exchanges internationally, as it banned 
the export of personal data from the EU to those countries without strict federal data 
protection laws. This included the U.S., and resulted in severe trade disputes at an